Evaluation of the efficacy of a simulation model used in oral and maxillofacial surgery education.

BACKGROUND: The traditional teaching methods of dental education are gradually being replaced with futuristic education methods based on the usage of educational tools such as mannequin-based simulation models and virtual reality. However, the effectiveness of mannequin-based simulation models as a learning method in the field of oral surgery remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of training on a tooth extraction model (TEM) in view of undergraduate dental students' experience and perception of their education. METHODS: A quasi-experimental trial was implemented with two consecutive year classes, totaling 136 students at the Dentistry Faculty of Altinbas University, Turkiye. Two cohorts were created from dental students in the classes of 2023 and 2022 graduates. Cohort 1 (n = 71) received 14 h of theoretical education followed by 10 h of preclinical education on TEM. Cohort 2 (n = 65) received only 14 h of theoretical education. An anonymous questionnaire was prepared with four main sections including the preferences of learning style, participants' perceptions of the preclinical training methods, the students' competency and free text comments. Students' opinions were quantified with both 7-point Likert scales and thematic analysis. Anxiety levels were measured with the interval scale of anxiety response (ISAR). Descriptive statistics, inferential statistical and thematic analyses were conducted according to survey responses. Student characteristics were summarized and compared for two cohorts using a t-test. For all statistical analyses, the significance level was set atP ≤ 0.05. RESULT: Cohort 1 was more comfortable with sequential motions performed with the forceps (P = 0.033) and felt more ready for their first clinical tooth extraction experience (P = 0.028). Cohort 2 showed a significantly higher preference for textbooks among supplementary materials (P = 0.04); however, they tended to exhibit lower self-confidence and higher anxiety levels, though without any statistical significance (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is clear that the students who have yet to start seeing patients benefit from increased practice with training models, which adequately reflect and represent real-life situations encountered in everyday practice.

Post-graduation career pathways: a nationwide survey among dental students in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) has to compete with other specialties for the best candidates. With the upcoming change of generations (Z and Alpha) and the movement toward gender parity of dentistry, understanding changing preferences and misconceptions is essential. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted by the German-Association-of-Oral-and-Maxillofacial-Surgery (DGMKG) across German dental schools. The survey collected demographic data, academic background, and career aspirations, with a focus on OMFS. The dental student survey results were compared to a survey given to OMFS Specialists. RESULTS: 637 dental students, mainly female (70%), from 30 German universities participated. 27% had defined career aspirations post-graduation, with self-employment and academia being popular choices. 67% were unsure. Specializations leaned towards restorative dentistry (41%), orthodontics (36%), and prosthodontics (31%). While 73% showed interest in surgical practices, 20% were attracted in specializing in OMFS. Of those averse to OMFS, 78% cited long training duration as the deterrent, 12% were put off by perceived unattractive working hours. Other reasons included negative undergraduate experiences, scarcity of part-time positions, and perceived inadequate earnings. CONCLUSION: Accurate data is crucial for career decisions. OMFS societies must proactively share accurate information and guide students. OMFS offers family-friendly hours, and while its training might be longer than dental specialties, it is on par with other surgical professions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dental students consistently regard OMFS as commendable career path. To guarantee sustained OMFS expertise, it is imperative to nurture this interest through dedicated academic mentorship and innovative education, thereby solidifying their professional direction.

Medical associate professionals in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Recent discourse around the implementation of medical associate professions (MAPs) into medical specialties has proven divisive and controversial. These roles could benefit oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) departments and grant trainees increased operating experience, but their implementation could prove detrimental to training. We discuss the potential impact in OMFS.

Survey of United Kingdom oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) specialists and trainees about the reasons that they retain or drop their registration with the General Dental Council (GDC) including a summary of changes in the numbers registered with the GDC 2014-2023.

When dual degree OMFS training was mandated in the UK in 1995, OMFS specialists were required to be registered with both the General Dental Council (GDC) and General Medical Council (GMC). In 2005 this legal requirement for dual registration with both regulators was removed. During 2021 the authors surveyed UK OMFS specialists and trainees asking them why they chose to remain on or leave the Dental Register to give context to the changing numbers of OMFS specialists and trainees holding Dental Registration between 2014 and 2023. In 2014 of 539 OMFS specialists and trainees only 62 (12%) were solely GMC registered, that is, they had let their Dental Registration lapse. In 2023, of 709 OMFS specialists and trainees, 320 (45%) were solely GMC registered. Those whose first qualification was medicine were less likely to be dually registered. Of those who replied to the survey and remained dually registered, most (40%) based this decision on 'worries about the consequences' of dropping their dental registration. Some other reasons were not based on fact at that time. Cost was the most common reason (49%) given for dropping their GDC registration by respondents who were only registered with the GMC. On the positive side, the January 2023 GDC position statement about OMFS who are not on the Dental Register removed the GDC's previous restriction on location of practice and teaching dental students. However the statement does not unambiguously allow OMFS surgeons to practice across the full OMFS curriculum. Will the 2023 GDC position statement alter the trend of OMFS specialists and trainees towards single medical registration?

How can we raise awareness and educate medical undergraduate students about OMFS?

In recent years there has been a rise in medicine-first graduates pursuing a career within OMFS, yet many studies report that undergraduate medical students lack sufficient knowledge about the specialty. The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that online methods of delivering undergraduate education are successful. We organised an online conference that comprised six lectures covering common clinical problems that OMF surgeons encounter, and the academic pathway. Delegates were asked to complete an optional pre/post-conference survey which aimed to assess students' interest in the specialty and their attitudes to online conferences. Participants were invited to undertake a semi-structured interview about their attitudes towards the use of online conferences and their ideas about how to interest students further. The interview was thematically analysed. The pre-conference and post-conference questionnaires were answered by 21 and 22 participants, respectively. The demographic consisted largely of undergraduate medical students. Most participants reported increased interest in the specialty after the conference. The interest of delegates wanting to follow an academic pathway decreased. Fewer delegates after the conference believed that online conferences could replace in-person conferences. Five participants undertook a semi-structured interview. Key themes identified were: a lack of exposure drives a lack of interest in OMFS, a desire to learn more about the specialty, and in-person conferences provide more opportunities for delegates. Online conferences can be used to increase student interest in OMFS, but students value in-person conferences more. Students are keen to learn more about the specialty.

Interest in global surgery rotations among oral and maxillofacial surgical residents in the United States.

PURPOSE: This study sought to assess interest in global surgery rotations among current United States (US)-based oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residents. METHODS: An anonymous 23-question survey was distributed to 633 current OMS residents in the US to examine resident interest in global surgery rotations during residency. The primary outcome variable was resident interest in participating in global OMS rotations during residency training, whereas the primary predictor variable was the presence of residency faculty involved in global OMS work. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all study variables and univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of interest in global OMS rotations. RESULTS: A total of 120 residents with an average age of 30.4 ± 3.2 years responded to the survey. At present, 22 (18.5%) residents stated that their residency programs offer some sort of global OMS rotation and 21 (95.5%) of these claimed they were willing to participate in global OMS rotations at their residency program. Out of the residents who stated their program did not offer a global OMS rotation, 86 (87.8%) respondents stated they would be interested in adding a dedicated global OMS rotation to their residency curriculum. The presence of OMS residency faculty involved in global OMS work (p = 0.030) and a resident's willingness to dedicate vacation time to participate in a global surgery rotation (p = 0.005) were associated with increased interest in a global surgery rotation. CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents would welcome a dedicated global OMS rotation during their residency training.

Can we support second degree students by incorporating non-surgical facial aesthetics into undergraduate dentistry during the first degree?

Non-surgical facial aesthetics (NSFA) are cosmetic procedures intended to reduce signs of ageing and provide facial rejuvenation. There is currently no recommendation for NSFA to be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum globally. This study aims to gain the views of final year dental students about pursuing a career in NSFA. An online survey was completed by 114 final year dental students across two English Universities. A total of 67% (77/114) of students would pursue a career in NSFA. A total of 76% (87/114) and 75% (86/114) of students were not aware of the complications associated with the administration of dermal fillers and Botox injections, respectively. Most students considered NSFA upon graduation. NSFA provides a transferable skillset and useful anatomical knowledge. Incorporation of NSFA in undergraduate education could financially support oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) trainees within their second degree. This may in turn promote retention within the speciality with high financial costs associated with OMFS training.

Exploring the concerns of second-degree dental students on entering specialist OMFS training and their attitudes towards the second-degree curriculum.

Within the UK, oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) is a competitive specialty with a rigorous training programme that currently requires dual degrees in both medicine and dentistry. Training in OMFS can present various challenges in terms of finances, length of training, and work-life balance. The current study explores the concerns of second-degree dental students in trying to obtain an OMFS specialty training post, as well as their views on the second-degree curriculum. An online survey was distributed via social media to second-degree dental students across the UK and 51 responses were received. Respondents cited a lack of publications (29%), specialty interviews (29%), and the OMFS logbook (29%) as the primary concerns about securing a higher training post. Eighty-eight per cent felt there were elements of repetition within the second degree for which competencies had already been achieved, and 88% agreed with streamlining the curriculum within the second degree. We propose that the second degree should incorporate ways to build the OMFS ST1/ST3 portfolio as part of a tailored curriculum, removing or condensing the repetitive elements, and instead emphasising areas of concern for trainees such as research, operative experience, and interview guidance. Second-degree students should be provided with mentors with an interest in research and academia to provide guidance and promote early interest in academia.

Oral maxillofacial surgery resident, faculty and practitioner role models and dental students' interest in oral maxillofacial surgery careers: Does gender matter?

PURPOSE: Residency programs in oral maxillofacial surgery (OMS) have the lowest percentage (2020: 18.4%) of female graduates among all dental specialty programs. When considering this underrepresentation of female OMS residents, prior studies have not examined how OMS role models might shape dental students' interest in OMS careers. The objectives were to assess female versus male students' OMS-related career motivation, their experiences/attitudes toward three groups of OMS role models (i.e., OMS residents, faculty, and practitioners), and relationships between role model-related experiences/attitudes and career motivation. METHODS: 363 female and 335 male students from 14 United States and two Canadian dental schools participated in this cross-sectional study by responding to an online survey. RESULTS: 13.8% of female and 26% of male respondents (p < 0.001) were much/very much interested in OMS careers. More male than female students had shadowed an OMS in an office setting (43.4% vs. 35.1%; p < 0.05). The groups did not differ in their motivation to learn more and earlier about OMS nor in the quantity of OMS-related experiences prior to and during dental school. However, male students were more satisfied with the quality of these experiences (5-point scale with 5 = most positive: Means: 3.76 vs. 3.53; p < 0.05), were more comfortable approaching/working with OMS instructors (3.51 vs. 3.19; p < 0.01) and reported to have learned more from residents (3.52 vs. 3.31; p < 0.05) and faculty (3.75 vs. 3.45; p < 0.01) than female students. Female students agreed less that OMS residents, faculty, and practitioners encouraged students to pursue OMS (3.27 vs. 3.44; p < 0.01 / 3.46 vs. 3.63; p < 0.01 / 3.45 vs. 3.61; p < 0.01). Role model-related experiences and attitudes correlated with an interest in an OMS career. CONCLUSIONS: The two groups do not differ in the quantity of most OMS experiences before and during dental school and their motivation to learn more and earlier about OMS. However, female students' less positive OMS-related educational experiences and less positive attitudes toward role models correlate with a lower interest in OMS careers.

#OMFSurgery: analyzing the use of social media applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery resident training.

BACKGROUND: Despite its increasing popularity, to our knowledge the use of social media applications (SM) for residents' training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) has not been investigated yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of SM applications by OMFS residents for post-graduate training in Germany. METHODS: For explorative assessment, an online questionnaire containing 27 questions about the current use of SM for resident training was sent to OMFS residents in Germany. RESULTS: Sixty-four colleagues participated to the study. Thirty-four participants (54%) responded to regularly use those platforms mainly for OMFS-related content. YouTube (65%, n = 37), Instagram (48%, n = 27), ResearchGate (25%, n = 14) and WhatsApp (16%, n = 9) were the most popular platforms. (Surgical) videos (97%, n = 59), pictures and graphics (82%, n = 50) were the mainly accessed contents. Forty-four participants (69%) stated that SM substantially contributed to their OMFS training. Dentoalveolar surgery and implantology (66%, n = 35) and aesthetic facial surgery (55%, n = 29) content contributed most to OMFS resident training. Fifty-one participants (80%) recommended an official SM account of the DGMKG. CONCLUSIONS: SM is frequently used by OMFS residents for the consumption of training-related content. There is an imbalance toward dentoalveolar and facial aesthetic surgery regarding the presented content. Academic institutions and societies should complement their educational activities to not miss this emerging educational innovation. Official SM content by academic institutions and societies could contribute to the existing educational activities.

Working whilst studying: a survey of medically-qualified dental students.

Medically-qualified junior trainees who are interested in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) are faced with the challenging decision to undertake the minimum three years required to obtain a Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) with its associated expenses and loss of income from full-time employment, or to follow a different career path. Trainees have reported duration of training and financial factors, such as cost of attaining additional qualifications and loss of income, as common reasons for loss of interest in OMFS. This survey of students enrolled on King's College London's three-year BDS dentistry entry programme for medical graduates (DPMG)shows that most studentsundertake paid part-time work in various settings and specialties alongside their studies. The average number of hours worked by students whilst studying is reported to be 27.0/week. Students report a wide range of incomes from various sources including secondary-care shifts in the NHS and private sector, as well as non-secondary-care activities such as non-surgical facial aesthetics. Direct correlation is noted between the number of hours worked and earnings, with comparable potential income in OMFS and non-OMFS specialties. Participants working in OMFS report greater educational and training value compared with non-OMFS work.

The Clinical Observership Program: A Valuable Experience for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Residents.

PURPOSE: Training during oral and maxillofacial surgery residency must include exposure to the scope of the specialty, but success in practice often requires particular experience and knowledge of complex oral regenerative procedures such as bone grafting and implant surgery, as well as practice management. Osteo Science Foundation created the Clinical Observership Program (COP) in 2017 to provide residents the opportunity to spend several weeks in an established oral and maxillofacial surgery practice to increase experience in these areas. The purpose of this study is to report the results of a survey of all resident participants in the COP from 2017 to 2021 in which participants were asked to rate their experience numerically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an institutional retrospective case series completed via an electronic survey sent to all participants in the COP from 2017 to 2021. The primary outcome is the subjective assessment of the COP based on six questions in which the respondent was asked to rate the program on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being best). Categories included: 1) Did the program achieve expectations? 2) Was adequate time spent with the mentor? 3) Did you observe/participate in a variety of procedures? 4) Did the mentor provide additional didactic education? 5) Did you learn about practice management? and 6) How would you rate the overall experience? Descriptive statistics including mean score and standard deviation of each question were calculated, and no other covariates were analyzed. RESULTS: All 55 participants in the COP from 2017 to 2021 were contacted and 55 complete responses were received. The overall mean score for all categories rated by the residents was 9.63, the mean rating for questions 1 to 6 were 9.55, 9.89, 9.21, 9.60, 9.69, and 9.86 respectively, and the range of scores was 7 to 10. CONCLUSION: Overall, residents rated the COP experience highly. This survey indicates that the COP is a valuable supplemental experience in oral and maxillofacial surgery resident education.

What are the concerns of second-degree medical students entering specialty OMFS training?

Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) applicants are faced with numerous challenges. Previous research has demonstrated that financial burden, length of OMFS training, and impact on personal life are cited as major drawbacks to pursuing the specialty, with trainees having concerns about the Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examinations. The current study aimed to explore second-degree medical students' concerns about obtaining a specialty training post in OMFS. An online survey was distributed via social media to second-degree students across the United Kingdom and 106 responses were received. A lack of publications and lack of involvement in research (54%) as well as attaining accreditation with the Royal College of Surgeons (27%) were cited as the primary and secondary concerns in relation to securing a higher training post. Seventy-five per cent of respondents had no first-author publications, 93% expressed concerns about passing the MRCS examination, and 73% had more than 40 OMFS procedures within their logbook. Second-degree medical students reported having ample clinical and operative experience in OMFS. Their main concerns were about research and MRCS examinations. To alleviate these concerns, BAOMS could provide educational initiatives and dedicated mentorship programmes for second-degree students, and could adopt a collaborative approach with discussion with major postgraduate training stakeholders.

Academic Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - when and how to enter the pathway.

Entering into surgical academia can seem a daunting prospect for an oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) trainee. However, the streamlining of academic training by the NIHR to create the integrated academic training (IAT) pathway has simplified academic training and more clearly defined academic positions and entry points for trainees. In this article we review the current NIHR IAT pathway and the various grades and entry points available to OMF surgeons, both pre- and post-doctoral. We highlight the unique challenges facing OMF trainees and provide advice and insight from both junior and senior OMFS academics. Finally, we focus on the planning and application for a doctoral research fellowship - discussing funding streams available to OMF surgeons.